Introduction
Here, I am describing historical evidence, which confirms that Zionists have instrumentalized antisemitism and islamophobia to promote the Zionist movement to create a Jewish ethnostate by colonizing historical Palestine. Evidence includes statements by the founders of Zionism, collaborations between Zionists and Antisemites, opposition of Zionists against (orthodox) Jews, and false flag attacks by Zionists on Jews or Jewish institutions or potential allies to strengthen the complementary narratives of “Jewish victimism” and “Islamic terrorism” [3].
General Sources:
[1] https://www.palestineremembered.com/A-List-of-Israeli-False-Flag-Operations.html
[2] https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20200829-israels-false-flag-anti-semitism/
[3] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/DJmknFt-A4w
Mechanism of Action
False-flag operations, especially if they pose as your enemy, have a mechanism of action which is especially harmful for peace and justice with the following scenarios:
- False-flag Scenario 1, Direct: The bad-faith aggressor poses as the good-faith victim, pretending that the good-faith victim attacked the bad-faith aggressor leading to solidarity of the observing public with the bad-faith aggressor, which they perceive as the victim, thereby, supporting the bad-faith actor in attacking the good-faith victim.
- False-flag Scenario 2, Indirect: The bad-faith aggressor poses as the good-faith victim, pretending that the good-faith victim attacked a third party, leading to a counter-attack of the third-party against the good-faith victim joining the alliance with the bad-faith aggressor (while ignorant that the bad-faith aggressor was the true aggressor).
Overall, a false-flag method will mobilize attacks of others against the good-faith victim while preventing a defense of others of the good-faith victim, while protecting the bad-faith aggressor and joining their actual attacks, which is an utter perversion of justice (“guilt reversal”). Ultimately, and important criterion for a false-flag operation is that the (planned, not uncovered) false-flag operation is expected to serve the interests of the bad-faith actor (and their allies) providing a motive and, vice versa, the operation is not expected to serve the strategic interests of the good-faith victim. For example, a violent terrorist attack by one group (good-faith victim), who is suppressed by another group (bad-faith aggressor), on civilizians of third party, will create mostly costs (eg, resources for planning and executing the attack, further strengthen the solidarity of the third party with the bad-faith aggressor) and minimal benefits (eg, public attention, showing strength), but is rarely in the rationale strategic interest of a good-faith victim, whose primary goal should be win allies for its cause.
Supporting factors
The cover and the effect of false-flag operations can be further strengthened by the following factors:
- False-flag attacks which show an extreme violation of basic human moral values (eg, attacks on children, extreme violence, sexual perversion) will lead to an immediate strong emotional reaction by observers which will bypass their critical thinking and will also create stable pattern of support. Even if the facts become known, observers will avoid accepting the new evidence because the want to avoid cognitive dissonance reduction, ie looking inconsistent (“looking stupid”) after they may have taken a strong initial (incorrect) position and will rather maintain their initial position or at least will avoid a radical change in their opinion.
- Any person who questions the explanation of events is at risk of also being attack by the majority as defending an extreme violation of basic human moral values, thereby, isolating protectors of the good-faith victim and the good-faith victim itself, which makes it easier for the bad-faith actor to control the narrative.
- If a false-flag action is executed in parallel with a similar attack on the enemy, and the attacker (here: Israel) takes the lead of “accusing the other of which one is guilty”, the defense or accusation by the actual victim will seem considerable weaker and less credible since it is perceived as a simple reciprocal reaction (“copy cat”) and may even reaffirm the suspicision that the actual victim is actually guilty.
- If the bad-faith aggressor has been already falsely accused and or punished for a past crime, which has not happened, the risk that the bad-faith aggressor will be suspected and punished for a similar crime again is very low. The “Double Jeopardy Clause” of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals from being tried twice for the same criminal offense after an acquittal or conviction to ensures finality in criminal proceedings.
- The short span of public attention creates a window of opportunity to obtain policy decision, eg to collect donations, harm the good-faith opponent or start a war, which can hardly be reversed even if the truth about the bad-faith aggressor is revealed, often decades later after archives of intelligence services are opened. Therefore, false-flag operations are usually a low-risk, high-reward operation.
- Third-parties may pursue their own (national, political, economic, racist) interests, which may create incentives to pretend to belief the false-flag narrative, to promote their own agenda.
Applying these considerations to Zionism as an example means, that Zionists of predominantly Jewish-European (Ashkenazi) ethnicity or religion exploited victimhood of European (Ashkenazi) Jews to commit false-flag operations similar to the crimes that European (Ashkenazi) jews suffered from during the European genocide of Jews under German nationalsocialism, which allowed them to commit extreme violence in attacking the indigenuous, predominantly Muslim-Arab population in Palestine (and neighbouring countries) with other countries supporting the violence of the bad-faith aggressor and not defending their good-faith victims.
European and European-descent countries (“the West”, “Global North”) support Zionism because of capitalist, colonialist, imperialist, racist, and fascist interests, including ethnically cleansing Europe of Jews by transfer to Palestine, domination in a world region with great natural ressources (esp. fossil fuels) , important trade routes (Suez channel, Strait of Hormuz), economic opportunities esp for the military-industrial complex, while being whitewashing policies of capitalism, colonialism, imperialism, racism, and fascism with religious narratives because of unique importance of this geographic region (eg, Jerusalem) for all Abrahamitic religions (eg, Judaism, Christianism, Islam).
Links:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double_Jeopardy_Clause
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cui_bono%3F
Policies
Zionist Antisemitism
Theodor Herzl, the founder of Zionism, stated:
“The antisemites will become our most loyal friends, the antisemites nations will become our allies.” [1, cited in 2, p. 47]
Correspondingly, there is also fundamental opposition between orthodox (Haredim) Jews and Zionists, against which the Israeli government goes also against with suppression and violence [5].
Source:
[1] Theodor Herzl, Entry of 12 June 1895, The Complete Diaries Of Theodor Herzl, Volume I, pages 83–84,
[2] Śegev, T., & Śegev, T. (2001). One Palestine, complete: Jews and Arabs under the British mandate (1. Owl Books ed). Holt.
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zionist_antisemitism
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haredim_and_Zionism
[5] https://www.newarab.com/news/israeli-police-attack-anti-zionist-jews-amid-gaza-war
HAMAS is not antisemitic
The Palestinian resistance organization HAMAS states clearly in their charta (2017):
“16. Hamas affirms that its conflict is with the Zionist project not with the Jews because of their religion. Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity.” [¹]
Therefore, HAMAS has declared no intention and no motivation to attack non-zionist Jews or Jewish organizations, such (terrorist) attacks would contradict their policies. In addition, HAMAS is a regional resistance organisation and to my knowledge has not operated outside Palestine or the Middle East, in general, esp. not Europe or the North America.
Source:
[1] Middle East Eye (2017-05-02). Hamas in 2017: The document in full, https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/hamas-2017-document-full
Iran is not antisemitic
An Israeli news outlet, Israel Hayom, reported that Iranian Jews in Israel say that they viewed Iran as their home and were allowed to practice Judaism freely. Iranian Jewish men are conscripted into the Iranian Armed Forces like all Iranian men. Iran’s Jewish community is officially recognized as a religious minority group by the government, and, like the Zoroastrians and Christians, they are allocated one seat in the Iranian Parliament. Homayoun Sameh is the current Jewish member of the parliament, replacing Siamak Moreh Sedgh in the 2020 election. In 2019 the Jewish Population numbered 8,300 and they constitute 0.01% of Iranian population. However, international conflicts with Israel, a Jewish ethnostate, lead also to tensions in Iran between Jews and non-Jews, creating an atmosphere of fear and suspicion and social and administrative discrimination. In summary, however, it seems Iranian Jews are rather well-integrated into Iranian society and an official antisemitic (ie, against Zionist and non-Zionist Jews in general) policies are not obvious.
Source:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Jews
Events
Collaboration of Zionists with Nazi Germany (Haavara Treaty, 1933)
The Haavara Agreement (Hebrew: הֶסְכֵּם הַעֲבָרָה, romanized: heskem haavara, lit. ’transfer agreement’) was an agreement between Nazi Germany and Zionist organizations signed on 25 August 1933. The agreement was finalized after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency) and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany. It was a major factor in making possible the migration of approximately 60,000 German Jews to Palestine between 1933 and 1939.
Source:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haavara_Agreement
Biological Warfare, Operation “Cast thy Bread” (1948)
Operation “Cast Thy Bread” was a top-secret biological warfare operation conducted by the Haganah and later the Israel Defense Forces that began in April 1948, during the 1948 Palestine war. The Haganah used typhoid bacteria to contaminate drinking water wells in violation of the 1925 Geneva Protocol. Its objective was to frighten and prevent Palestinian Arabs from returning to their captured villages and to make conditions difficult for Arab armies attempting to retake territories. The operation resulted in severe illness among local Palestinian citizens. In the final months of the war, the government of Israel gave orders to expand the biological warfare campaign into neighboring Arab states such as Egypt, Lebanon, and Syria, but they were not carried out. Israeli prime minister David Ben-Gurion and IDF chief of general staff Yigael Yadin oversaw and approved the use of biological warfare.
In May 1948, during Operation Shalach, four Israeli Special Forces soldiers disguised as Arabs attempted to poison the local water supply in Gaza to impede the Egyptian army’s advance. They infiltrated the city with tubes containing typhoid germs. The Israeli soldiers were captured by Egyptian soldiers near water wells on 23 May and executed by an Egyptian military court on 22 August 1948.
Sources:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cast_Thy_Bread
[2] Morris, B., & Kedar, B. Z. (2023). ‘Cast thy bread’: Israeli biological warfare during the 1948 War. Middle Eastern Studies, 59(5), 752–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2022.2122448
[3] The New Arab (2022, October 15). Israel forces ’poisoned Palestine wells’ during 1948 Nakba. . https://Www.Newarab.Com/. https://www.newarab.com/news/israel-forces-poisoned-palestine-wells-during-1948-nakba
Attacks on Iraqui Jews (1950, 1951)
British-Israeli historian Avi Shlaim claims to have uncovered “undeniable proof” of Israeli involvement in attacks on Jewish communities in Iraq in the early 1950s. In his autobiography ‘Three Worlds: Memoirs of an Arab-Jew’ published earlier this month, Shlaim details his childhood as an Iraqi Jew and subsequent exile to Israel. His book also includes research about a number of bombings in Baghdad which prompted a mass exodus of Jews from the country between 1950 and 1951, most of whom, like he and his family, ended up in Israel. A police report and an interview with a former Zionist operative form the basis of Shlaim’s claim that Israel’s spy agency Mossad was involved in several of these attacks. Shlaim also writes that Iraqi Jews did not face antisemitism until the 1940s, when they were suspected of being complicit in the British invasion of Iraq in 1941 and in the Nakba, or the ethnic cleansing of historic Palestine that led to the creation of Israel in 1948. He adds that the Zionist project led to Jews from all across Arab countries going from respected fellow citizens to akin to a fifth column allied with the new Jewish state. [1, 2]
Sources:
[1] Shlaim, A. (2023). Three worlds: Memoirs of an Arab-Jew. Oneworld.
[2] Middle East Eye (2023-06-20). Zionist role in pushing Jews from Iraq to Israel in 1950s. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_hZP14ANCI
Lavon Affair/Operation Susannah (1954)
The Lavon affair was a failed Israeli covert operation, codenamed Operation Susannah, conducted in Egypt in the summer of 1954. As part of a false flag operation,[1] a group of Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli military intelligence to plant bombs inside Egyptian-, American-, and British-owned civilian targets: cinemas, libraries, and American educational centers. The bombs were timed to detonate several hours after closing time. The attacks were to be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood, Egyptian communists, “unspecified malcontents”, or “local nationalists” with the aim of creating a climate of sufficient violence and instability to induce the British government to retain its occupying troops in Egypt’s Suez Canal zone. Israel publicly denied any involvement in the incident until 2005, when the surviving agents were awarded certificates of appreciation by Israeli President Moshe Katsav.
Sources:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair
[2] https://cisac.fsi.stanford.edu/publications/the_lavon_affair_how_a_falseflag_operation_led_to_war_and_the_israeli_bomb
London Israeli embassy bombing (1994)
The 1994 London Israeli Embassy bombing was a car bomb attack on the Israeli embassy in Kensington, London, on 26 July 1994. The explosion injured twenty civilians and caused extensive damage to nearby buildings. A second bomb exploded several hours later outside Balfour House in Finchley, which housed the London offices of the United Jewish Israel Appeal (UJIA), injuring six people. Two Palestinian engineers, Samar Alami and Jawad Botmeh, were later convicted of conspiracy to cause explosions in connection with the attacks.
Annie Machon was an intelligence officer for the U.K.’s MI5 in the 1990s, who said [2, 3, 4]:
“There was also the imprisoning and the conviction of two innocent people for conspiracy to bomb the Israeli embassy in 1994 in London. And MI5 had evidence that they were innocent and still let them go ahead and be convicted. …
Why? That’s a very good question, because MI5’s assessment, after they looked at all the evidence around this case, was that Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, had carried out a controlled explosion outside their own embassy in order to, one, increase the security around all their interests in London, which they’d been pushing for farsor ye, and MI5 kept telling them to, you know, take a hike, and also to frame these two innocent people who were involved in Palestinian support networks in London. “
Sources:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_London_Israeli_embassy_bombing
[2] https://truthout.org/video/an-mi5-whistle-blowers-story/
[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivkAZcbpB5c
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDibHD11XYw
False-flag FBI operation to recruit muslims for terrorist attacks in Irvine, California (2006)
In 2006, the FBI recruited Craig Monteilh as an informant for Operation Flex, a counterterrorism operation targeting the Islamic Center of Irvine (ICOI) in California. Monteilh posed as a Muslim convert, gathered intelligence, and planted recording devices in the mosque and homes of community members, and tried to recruit members of the muslim community for terrorist attacks, eg suggesting to bomb something as part of Jihad. He was reported to the police which issued a restraining order by ICOI. The FBI ended the operation and distanced itself from Monteilh, who later claimed the FBI failed to protect him after his role was exposed. He was subsequently stabbed in prison in 2008 after being labeled a snitch.
In 2011, three ICOI members, represented by the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union), filed a class-action lawsuit against the FBI, alleging unconstitutional surveillance, religious profiling, and violations of their rights under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The FBI invoked the state secrets privilege to dismiss the case, arguing that litigation would risk national security. The district court initially dismissed the lawsuit, but the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals partially reversed this decision in 2019, ruling that FISA allowed the plaintiffs to challenge the surveillance.
The FBI appealed to the Supreme Court, which in March 2022 unanimously ruled that FISA does not override the state secrets privilege, reversing the Ninth Circuit and remanding the case. This decision reinforced the government’s ability to block lawsuits involving sensitive surveillance operations by claiming state secrets.
As of March 2026, the case remains a focal point in debates over government transparency, religious profiling, and the balance between national security and civil liberties. Monteilh has since publicly claimed that some of his earlier testimony was fabricated, complicating the legal proceedings and his relationship with the ACLU, which continues to push for accountability over what it describes as unconstitutional spying on Muslim Americans
Sources:
[0] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rabia-billings-nee-nettuno-mba-%F0%9F%8D%89-75784226_ugcPost-7491918959257059328-WusG/
[1] https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/01/craig-monteilh-fbi-aclu-supreme-court-00805402
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation_v._Fazaga
[3] https://ca.cair.com/press-release/cair-cas-first-ever-supreme-court-case/
[4] https://time.com/6285802/fbi-spying-muslim-secret/
[5] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/listen-live-supreme-court-hears-arguments-on-fbi-surveillance-of-muslims-after-9-11
[6] https://moultrieobserver.com/2021/11/08/high-court-to-hear-secrets-case-over-muslim-surveillance/
US Zionist Jew posed as a Muslim Jihadist to trick Muslims to attack Anti-Muslim Exhibition and 9/11 memorial event (2015)
Joshua Ryne Goldberg, a US Zionist Jew from Jacksonville, Florida, USA, posed as a Muslim Jihadist from ISIS to try to convince Muslims to attack the USA.
He convinced two muslims to attack the “Muhammed Art Exhibition”, Garland, Texas, in 2015. The Muhammad Art Exhibition was organized by Zionist Jew Pamela Geller, which awarded a prize of 10,000USD to the artist who mocks the prophet Muhammad worst. The two recruited men initiated the attack, but both were shot by the police before being able to enter the building [1,2,3,4].
Joshua Ryne Goldberg also tried to trick someone into bombing a memorial of the attacks on the World Trade Center, New York, on 2001-09-11, which was to be held in Kansas City, Missouri, USA, in 2015. The plot, however, was discovered before the plans could be executed [5].
In total, Joshua Ryne Goldberg was only sentenced to 9 months in prison for both crimes.
Sources:
[1] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/erol-demirkaya-8760a456_i-believe-there-will-be-a-big-attempt-like-ugcPost-7498387392383401984-YwVm
Note: Original content by Erik Warsaw and shared by Erol Demirkaya@linkedin.com
[2] https://www.timesofisrael.com/florida-jew-arrested-for-posing-as-online-jihadist-encouraging-terrorism/
[3] https://www.courthousenews.com/fatal-shootout-erupts-atanti-muslim-art-show/
[4] https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/05/07/405052650/no-regrets-for-organizer-of-muhammad-cartoon-contest
[5] https://edition.cnn.com/2015/09/10/us/9-11-memorial-bomb-plot-kansas-city-missouri
US-Israeli teen threatens Jewish centres (2018)
A court in Israel has convicted a 19-year-old American-Israeli man of making hundreds of threats to bomb or attack Jewish schools and community centres. He was accused of making more than 2,000 bomb threats to Jewish institutions, airlines, airports, police stations, hospitals and sporting events.
Sources:
[1] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-44641427
Distribution of “I love Hamas” stickers by Jewish Student Organisation (2023)
Students with the UBC Social Justice Centre (SJC) are considering legal options after stickers proclaiming support for Hamas wrongfully using the centre name were spotted around campus Saturday, Nov. 18. The centre says stickers reading “I (heart) Hamas” along with the UBC SJC logo and name were placed on posters advertising a student walkout for Palestine. Photos of the stickers were circulated widely across social media, and since then, the group says its members have been facing threats and harassment. In a statement to social media, Jewish Student organization Hillel BC confirmed an independent contractor “participated in the distribution of offensive stickers around UBC campus.”
Sources:
[1] https://vancouver.citynews.ca/2023/11/24/ubc-social-justice-centre-hamas-sticker/
Disguised Israeli soldiers kill wounded Palestinians in hospital (2024)
Israeli forces disguised as civilian women and medics stormed a hospital Tuesday in the occupied West Bank, killing three Palestinian militants in a dramatic raid that underscored how deadly violence has spilled into the territory from the war in Gaza.
Security camera footage from the hospital shows about a dozen undercover forces, most of them armed, wearing Muslim headscarves, hospital scrubs or white doctor’s coats. One carried a rifle in one arm and a folded wheelchair in the other.
The Palestinian Health Ministry said Israeli forces opened fire inside the Ibn Sina Hospital in the West Bank town of Jenin. A hospital spokesperson said there was no exchange of fire, indicating it was a targeted killing.
Source:
[1] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/israeli-undercover-forces-disguised-as-women-and-doctors-kill-three-militants-at-west-bank-hospital
Booby-trap Walkie-Talkie/Pager Attack on Hezbollah by Mossad (2024)
The retired Mossad Agent “Michael” states in a “60 Minutes” TV show interview [1, 2, 3]:
Interviewer: “How did you convince Hezbollah to buy this [ie, Booby-trapped Walkie Talkies]?”
Mossad Agent “Michael”: “Well, obviously they didn’t know that they were buying it from Israel.”
Interviewer: “Who did they buy it from or think they were buying it from?”
Mossad Agent: “We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way been traced back to Israel. Shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world. We are a Global Production Company. We write the screenplay, we’re the directors, the producers, we are the main actors and the world is our stage.”
Interviewer: “This is Mossad’s old office. It’s motto from Proverbs 24:6 says in so many words: “Wage war through deception and trickery.”, kind of like the CIA “Smoke and mirrors.”, which is what this operation was all about. Starting with those walkie-talkies but walkie-talkies are only worn in battle, so Mossad began developing a new device that Hezbollah Fighters would have in their pockets all the time.”
Sources:
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_Lebanon_electronic_device_attacks
[2] How Israel’s Mossad tricked Hezbollah into buying explosive pagers | 60 Minutes, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLUUUZWjfGk
[3] Transcript: https://pastebin.com/ZdtDB8dY (via https://youtubetotranscript.com/transcript?v=FLUUUZWjfGk)
[4] Hoy, C., & Ostrovsky, V. (1990). By way of deception. Stoddart.
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/By_Way_of_Deception
US-Israeli regime change operation in Iran (2026)
Israel was heavily involved in the civil protests in Iran in January 2026 and triggering the US-Israeli attack on Iran as part of a “classic” 4-step regime change operation with the following steps [1, as presented and predicted by Prof Mearsheimer on Jan 15, 2026):
- Economic warfare: The U.S. imposes sanctions that deliberately damage Iran’s economy, creating widespread hardship. Protests then arise largely in response to these externally induced economic conditions.
- Fueling protests: The U.S. and Israel allegedly encourage, organize, and support mass protests, citing evidence such as Israeli media reports, statements by U.S. officials, Mossad involvement, and the use of Starlink terminals by protesters after Iran shut down the internet.
- Disinformation campaign: Western audiences are told the protests are purely internal and democratic, while messaging inside Iran is designed to convince people the regime is collapsing and momentum is unstoppable.
- Military intervention: Once the regime appears near collapse, U.S. and Israeli military force would be used to strike infrastructure and elites to finish it off.
The following elements of this 4-step program were also conducted as covert/false-flag operations by US-Israel framing the regime change operations as Iranian grass-roots operations:
- US-Israel smuggled 6,000 Star link terminals over two years into Iran, to keep protesters connected during protests while the Iranian government was shutting down the internet [5].
- Israel tried to recruit Iran’s anti-Zionist former president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to lead a new post-Islamic regime in Tehran, and even sent its top spy to Budapest to meet him, according to media reports. Ahmadinejad had previously denied the holocaust and the so called “right to exist” by Israel. [2, 3, 4]
- As the protests unfolded, figures like former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Israel’s heritage minister, Amichai Eliyahu, said that Mossad agents were among the demonstrators.
- There were reports of killings of civilians which were not by Iranian government forces [7, 8], which increased the high death toll (ranging between 7,015-36,500+) [9] and contributed to the intensity of the conflict between protesters and the Iranian government, and also de-legitimizing the Iranian government and the later attack on Iran.
- There were reports of over 100 police officer being killed by the protesters [10], which also explains the force of the crackdown by the Iranian government to uphold public order.
Sources:
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vZe1ujSljbw
[2] https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jul/13/israel-courted-mahmoud-ahmadinejad-iran-former-hardline-president-post-regime-role-reports-claim
[3] https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/mossad-plan-fuer-regimewechsel-in-iran-wie-israels-operation-gestiefelter-kater-spektakulaer-scheiterte-a-4ad68733-5c43-4c26-a1cf-10194b92bef0
[4] https://www.spiegel.de/ausland/mahmoud-ahmadinejad-der-holocaustleugner-der-fuer-israel-und-die-usa-die-macht-in-iran-uebernehmen-sollte-a-56c40544-2767-479d-95f0-aa454a2e5178
[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRkqWM96pwE
[6] https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/u-s-smuggled-thousands-of-starlink-terminals-into-iran-after-protest-crackdown-69a8c74f
[7] https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/strange-figures-and-unexplained-killings-clues-mossad-infiltrated-irans-protests
[8] https://mondoweiss.net/2026/02/the-night-the-protests-in-iran-were-co-opted-by-outside-forces/
[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025%E2%80%932026_Iranian_protests
[10] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/11/iran-says-dozens-of-officers-killed-as-protesters-defy-government-crackdown
IDF soldiers impersonated HAMAS fighters (Washington, DC, 2026)
Two Israeli IDF soldiers impersonated Palestinians (ie, Gaza students, former Hamas fighters) were observed trying to incite hatred against jews and record it on camera while standing next to their pro-Israeli booth in Washington (DC) Square Park, USA. These two advocates, who were dressed with Palestinian scarves (keffiyeh) and carried a Palestinian flag, approached passengers telling them they were “students from Gaza” and “like to rape Jewish women and kill Jewish kids”, showed fotos of victims on Oct 7, 2023, pretended to have raped and stabbed Israeli women and shot crying Israeli children, and then asked whether the passenger “was with the resistance”. Thereby, they painted Palestinians as violent terrorist and tried to incite hatred against Jews. After being exposed they left the scene, re-dressed and came back to join the pro-Israeli booth by the “Zahal Disabled Veterans Organization” (around 8-10 people). The two Israeli soldiers were identified as “Stav Cohen” (IDF reservist, lawyer) and “Adi Karni” (First sergeant IDF soldier) . [1,2,3]
This pro-Israeli group are part of an organization called “Frontline Advocates”, who deploys trained Israeli advocates, ie 15 elite members of IDF veterans, directly to the college campuses and public squares in America. The organization also collaborates with the “Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs.” [4]
Figure 1: Screenshot of Website of Frontline Advocates (2026-08-29)

Links:
[1] https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7499327422052397056
[2] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/uzmasattar_you-would-never-see-a-pro-palestiniian-ugcPost-7498961795446001664-Lo5O
Note: Original content created by @davidsaysstuff shared by uzmsattar@linkedin.com
[3] https://www.linkedin.com/posts/tiny-hands_yes-always-manufacturing-hasbara-ugcPost-7498743610109005824-PCGM
Note: Original content created by @PROTON777@upscrolled.com shared via @tinyhands@linkedin.com
[4] https://frontline-advocates.com