1. Introduction
Climate activism is often based on loosely defined concepts such as “Non-Violent Direct Action” (NVDA), “civil disobedience”, “strikes”, “protests”, and other forms, which may be used with different meanings by different groups, and, therefore, lack conceptual clarity. In the following I try to systematize forms of (climate) activism for system change to provide more conceptual clarity to identify underused or unused forms of climate activism and to generally improve the cost-effectiveness ratio of climate activism. In addition, reflecting the core dimensions of an action will also help to understand the “action logic“, which will give activists greater determination while performing the action. These reflections are also relevant in a wider context of activism to achieve system change.
2. Taxonomy
I propose the following core dimensions to classify climate activism:
- Current system
- liberal: The system allows and promotes liberal rights, ie civil rights, to freely express citizen opinion and uses moderate legal actions against illegal actions, because it recognizes the high value of civil rights to create or maintain justice and innovate society. Example: Scandinavian countries
- anti-liberal: The system prohibits or systematically suppresses the expression of citizen opinion which is critical to the current system and takes aggressive legal or illegal action against actions which do not follow social norms or current laws. Example: Russia, China
- Conformity
Note: In moral terms, laws or law enforcement actions, which violate the interests of future generations, are not democratic and, therefore, lack a moral basis (see comment here [¹]).- legal/conformist: Activists follow existing laws and norms. Examples: approved protests, petitions, lobbyism, information campaigns, marketing, non-violence
- illegal/non-conformist: Activists violate existing laws and norms. Examples: illegal protests or direct actions, shock protests, eg die-ins, nude protests
- Pathway
- indirect: Activists put pressure on decision-makers, eg political or business leaders or individual consumers, to perform the demanded changes in lieu o the activists. Example: Demands for government action
- direct: Activists decrease or stop unwanted processes or events, eg coal mining, air travel. Example: Flying drones at airports, blocking coal mines
- Activity level
- passive: Activists decrease the level of activity which supports the current system. Example: Boycott of production and consumption.
- active: Activist increases the level of activity which supports the target system. Example: tree planting, sustainable or subsistence farming, biking, installation of solar panels
- Directionality
- defensive : Activists block actions initiated by the current system. Example: blockade of deforestation by coal mining (cf “Hambacher Forst”)
- offensive: Activists initiate action to de-install the current system and install the target system. Example: destruction of fossil fuel infrastructure
- Medium
- theoretical/intellectual: Activists sharing information. Example: Personal conversations, flyers, websites
Note: Logical fallacies (propaganda methods) may be used here such as stating opinion as facts, strawman arguments (argumentum ad absurdum), shooting the messenger (argumentum ad hominem) and others.- targeting objects: Activists promote facts and values of their target system, and vice versa.
- facts
- values
- targeting subjects: The activists attack the social status of an opponent.
- targeting objects: Activists promote facts and values of their target system, and vice versa.
- practical/physical: Activism physically changing the reality. Example: street protests, road blocks
- targeting objects
- targeting subjects
- theoretical/intellectual: Activists sharing information. Example: Personal conversations, flyers, websites
- Public Relations
- activist and audience
- ignorant: Activists perform their actions without taking public reactions into account or assessing them as irrelevant.
- confrontational: Activists send provocative messages and perform confrontational actions, eg to widen the Overton-Window. Example: Messages which are unpopular, eg promoting birth control in high-income countries
- targeted: Activists target their actions at a subgroup, which has similar values. Example: Extinction Rebellion telling the truth using confrontational language and symbols, eg mass extinction, animal skulls, to activate and recruit like-minded “upstanders”, who are willing to take action in the face of an emergency.
- populist: Activists target the majority of the population. Example: Promoting low-commitment, low-impact, feel-good strategies, eg switch-off your car while waiting at traffic lights, re-use plastic bags, handing out chocolate.
- activist and object
Note: The audience may have different values from the activist, and reverse psychology may cause that a message as unintended effects.
Example: “President Trump is a rich, sexist idiot who is lying to gain personal advantage.” may be perceived as positive by republican voters (“My kind of guy!”).- positive: Activist uses positive attributes for the object (eg person, organisation or product). Example: good vegan diet and climate activist audience
- negative: Activist uses negative attributes for the object (eg person, organisation or product). Example: bad oil companies and climate activist audience
- neutral: Activist uses neutral attributes for the object (eg person, organisation or product). Example: the yellow moon and climate activist audience
- activist and audience
- Anonymity:
Note: Activists use a false identity to promote their message. Example: Oil companies creating false grass roots movements (“astroturfing”, “false flag”), use “independent” think thanks, or other types of re-branding.- true identity: Activists present their identity and identifiable features (face, name, ….). Example: Extinction Rebellion (not Red Rebels), Fridays For Future Protests
- no identity: Activists hide their identity and identifiable features,. Example: Extinction Rebellion’s “Red Rebels”, “Black Block”, eg using uniforms, masks, large masses, code names.
- Quantity:
- individual: Activists act as individuals. Example: initial solo protests by Greta Thunberg, Rebellion of One
- mass: Activists act in large groups. Example: Global Climate Strikes, Ende Gelände Actions, International Rebellion Week by Extinction Rebellion
3. Carbon-tage
At the current stage of climate emergency and current forms of climate activism failing to achieve the required system change, I propose to assess current forms of climate activism and preferably apply forms which lower the costs for the activists and increase the effectiveness in terms of limiting or decreasing the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. As explained elsewhere [2], passive resistance including sabotage (“eco-tage”/ “carbon-tage”), which has historically been applied in fascists systems like German nationalsocialism, may increase the chances of system change in comparison to current methods. The neologism “Carbontage” describes here all forms of sabotage, which decrease carbon (or greenhouse gases, in general) emissions by reducing production or consumption in a fossil-fuel based, unsustainable economic system.
Sabotage (“Carbon-tage”) can be classified (depending on the local system, here Sweden):
Core features:
- liberal
- illegal/non-conformist
- direct
Additional features:
- passive or active
- defensive or aggressive
- theoretical or physical
- ignorant, confrontational, targeted, or populist
- non-identifiable or identifiable
- individual or mass
4. Examples of civil resistance from Gene Sharp’s list
See categories and examples of actions of civil resistance from the famous list of actions of civil resistance by NVDA theorist Gene sharp [WEB], which is cited here for convenience:
198 METHODS OF NONVIOLENT ACTION
Practitioners of nonviolent struggle have an entire arsenal of “nonviolent weapons” at their disposal. Listed below are 198 of them, classified into three broad categories: nonviolent protest and persuasion, noncooperation (social, economic, and political), and nonviolent intervention. A description and historical examples of each can be found in volume two of The Politics of Nonviolent Action, by Gene Sharp.
THE METHODS OF NONVIOLENT PROTEST AND PERSUASION
Formal Statements
1. Public Speeches
2. Letters of opposition or support
3. Declarations by organizations and institutions
4. Signed public statements
5. Declarations of indictment and intention
6. Group or mass petitions
Communications with a Wider Audience
7. Slogans, caricatures, and symbols
8. Banners, posters, and displayed communications
9. Leaflets, pamphlets, and books
10. Newspapers and journals
11. Records, radio, and television
12. Skywriting and earthwriting
Group Representations
13. Deputations
14. Mock awards
15. Group lobbying
16. Picketing
17. Mock elections
Symbolic Public Acts
18. Displays of flags and symbolic colors
19. Wearing of symbols
20. Prayer and worship
21. Delivering symbolic objects
22. Protest disrobings
23. Destruction of own property
24. Symbolic lights
25. Displays of portraits
26. Paint as protest
27. New signs and names
28. Symbolic sounds
29. Symbolic reclamations
30. Rude gestures
Pressures on Individuals
31. “Haunting” officials
32. Taunting officials
33. Fraternization
34. Vigils
Drama and Music
35. Humorous skits and pranks
36. Performances of plays and music
37. Singing
Processions
38. Marches
39. Parades
40. Religious processions
41. Pilgrimages
42. Motorcades
Honoring the Dead
43. Political mourning
44. Mock funerals
45. Demonstrative funerals
46. Homage at burial places
Public Assemblies
47. Assemblies of protest or support
48. Protest meetings
49. Camouflaged meetings of protest
50. Teach-ins
Withdrawal and Renunciation
51. Walk-outs
52. Silence
53. Renouncing honors
54. Turning one’s back
THE METHODS OF SOCIAL NONCOOPERATION
Ostracism of Persons
55. Social boycott
56. Selective social boycott
57. Lysistratic nonaction
58. Excommunication
59. Interdict
Noncooperation with Social Events, Customs, and Institutions
60. Suspension of social and sports activities
61. Boycott of social affairs
62. Student strike
63. Social disobedience
64. Withdrawal from social institutions
Withdrawal from the Social System
65. Stay-at-home
66. Total personal noncooperation
67. “Flight” of workers
68. Sanctuary
69. Collective disappearance
70. Protest emigration (hijrat)
THE METHODS OF ECONOMIC NONCOOPERATION: ECONOMIC BOYCOTTS
Actions by Consumers
71. Consumers’ boycott
72. Nonconsumption of boycotted goods
73. Policy of austerity
74. Rent withholding
75. Refusal to rent
76. National consumers’ boycott
77. International consumers’ boycott
Action by Workers and Producers
78. Workmen’s boycott
79. Producers’ boycott
Action by Middlemen
80. Suppliers’ and handlers’ boycott
Action by Owners and Management
81. Traders’ boycott
82. Refusal to let or sell property
83. Lockout
84. Refusal of industrial assistance
85. Merchants’ “general strike”
Action by Holders of Financial Resources
86. Withdrawal of bank deposits
87. Refusal to pay fees, dues, and assessments
88. Refusal to pay debts or interest
89. Severance of funds and credit
90. Revenue refusal
91. Refusal of a government’s money
Action by Governments
92. Domestic embargo
93. Blacklisting of traders
94. International sellers’ embargo
95. International buyers’ embargo
96. International trade embargo
THE METHODS OF ECONOMIC NONCOOPERATION: THE STRIKE
Symbolic Strikes
97. Protest strike
98. Quickie walkout (lightning strike)
Agricultural Strikes
99. Peasant strike
100. Farm Workers’ strike
Strikes by Special Groups
101. Refusal of impressed labor
102. Prisoners’ strike
103. Craft strike
104. Professional strike
Ordinary Industrial Strikes
105. Establishment strike
106. Industry strike
107. Sympathetic strike
Restricted Strikes
108. Detailed strike
109. Bumper strike
110. Slowdown strike
111. Working-to-rule strike
112. Reporting “sick” (sick-in)
113. Strike by resignation
114. Limited strike
115. Selective strike
Multi-Industry Strikes
116. Generalized strike
117. General strike
Combination of Strikes and Economic Closures
118. Hartal
119. Economic shutdown
THE METHODS OF POLITICAL NONCOOPERATION
Rejection of Authority
120. Withholding or withdrawal of allegiance
121. Refusal of public support
122. Literature and speeches advocating resistance
Citizens’ Noncooperation with Government
123. Boycott of legislative bodies
124. Boycott of elections
125. Boycott of government employment and positions
126. Boycott of government depts., agencies, and other bodies
127. Withdrawal from government educational institutions
128. Boycott of government-supported organizations
129. Refusal of assistance to enforcement agents
130. Removal of own signs and placemarks
131. Refusal to accept appointed officials
132. Refusal to dissolve existing institutions
Citizens’ Alternatives to Obedience
133. Reluctant and slow compliance
134. Nonobedience in absence of direct supervision
135. Popular nonobedience
136. Disguised disobedience
137. Refusal of an assemblage or meeting to disperse
138. Sitdown
139. Noncooperation with conscription and deportation
140. Hiding, escape, and false identities
141. Civil disobedience of “illegitimate” laws
Action by Government Personnel
142. Selective refusal of assistance by government aides
143. Blocking of lines of command and information
144. Stalling and obstruction
145. General administrative noncooperation
146. Judicial noncooperation
147. Deliberate inefficiency and selective noncooperation by enforcement agents
148. Mutiny
Domestic Governmental Action
149. Quasi-legal evasions and delays
150. Noncooperation by constituent governmental units
International Governmental Action
151. Changes in diplomatic and other representations
152. Delay and cancellation of diplomatic events
153. Withholding of diplomatic recognition
154. Severance of diplomatic relations
155. Withdrawal from international organizations
156. Refusal of membership in international bodies
157. Expulsion from international organizations
THE METHODS OF NONVIOLENT INTERVENTION
Psychological Intervention
158. Self-exposure to the elements
159. The fast
a) Fast of moral pressure
b) Hunger strike
c) Satyagrahic fast
160. Reverse trial
161. Nonviolent harassment
Physical Intervention
162. Sit-in
163. Stand-in
164. Ride-in
165. Wade-in
166. Mill-in
167. Pray-in
168. Nonviolent raids
169. Nonviolent air raids
170. Nonviolent invasion
171. Nonviolent interjection
172. Nonviolent obstruction
173. Nonviolent occupation
Social Intervention
174. Establishing new social patterns
175. Overloading of facilities
176. Stall-in
177. Speak-in
178. Guerrilla theater
179. Alternative social institutions
180. Alternative communication system
Economic Intervention
181. Reverse strike
182. Stay-in strike
183. Nonviolent land seizure
184. Defiance of blockades
185. Politically motivated counterfeiting
186. Preclusive purchasing
187. Seizure of assets
188. Dumping
189. Selective patronage
190. Alternative markets
191. Alternative transportation systems
192. Alternative economic institutions
Political Intervention
193. Overloading of administrative systems
194. Disclosing identities of secret agents
195. Seeking imprisonment
196. Civil disobedience of “neutral” laws
197. Work-on without collaboration
198. Dual sovereignty and parallel government
Without doubt, a large number of additional methods have already been used but have not been classified, and a multitude of additional methods will be invented in the future that have the characteristics of the three classes of methods: nonviolent protest and persuasion, noncooperation and nonviolent intervention.
It must be clearly understood that the greatest effectiveness is possible when individual methods to be used are selected to implement the previously adopted strategy. It is necessary to know what kind of pressures are to be used before one chooses the precise forms of action that will best apply those pressures.
Source:
Gene Sharp (1973). The Politics of Nonviolent Action (3 Vols.) Boston: Porter Sargent. https://www.aeinstein.org/nonviolentaction/198-methods-of-nonviolent-action/
5. References
[¹] Igl, W. (2019). “Political decisions violating the interests of future generations are not democratic”, http://biosphere.wilmarigl.de/en/?p=1534
[2] Igl, W (2019). “Mission 2020: An analysis of the current state of climate, climate politics and climate activism”, http://biosphere.wilmarigl.de/en/?p=1531
Added References:
Disclaimer
The current text should not and cannot be used to infer that I am promoting illegal activities in a past, present or future system, whose jurisdiction applies to me.